Department of Commerce decision puts fate of U.S. solar industry in jeopardy

Department of Commerce decision puts fate of U.S. solar industry in jeopardy

George Strobel writes:

On March 28, in a decision that would put the U.S. solar industry on hold, the U.S. Department of Commerce initiated an anti-dumping investigation into imports of solar cells and modules from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam in response to a petition from a small California solar panel manufacturer, Auxin Solar. The investigation could result in tariffs of up to 250% on imports from these four countries, which account for more than 80% of all U.S. solar module imports. These tariffs could cripple solar deployment, threaten tens of thousands of U.S. jobs and make it virtually impossible for the Biden administration to meet its climate goals.

Auxin Solar claims that more tariffs would boost domestic manufacturing, but with very limited commercial production capacity currently in the United States, it is unlikely that domestic producers could meet growing demand. Drastic, short-term measures like these typically only create uncertainty in the market as opposed to meaningful legislative efforts that could incentivize U.S. production, such as domestic-based manufacturing tax credits. Based on what is known about the potential side effects of losing solar imports, the petition is nothing short of an unwitting attempt to promote the interests of Auxin Solar at the detriment of the U.S. solar industry, its workers and its transition to a clean energy economy.

According to SEIA, new tariffs would result in an annual loss of 16 GW of new solar installations, a figure representing two-thirds of all solar panels the U.S. installed in 2021. An estimated 70,000 U.S. solar jobs would be lost, electricity costs would rise and U.S. carbon emissions would increase by a disastrous 61 million metric tons over the next four years. Of greater significance, this decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) will cause the U.S., and indirectly the rest of the world, to be more dependent on Russian and Middle Eastern oil to fuel growth in energy consumption. [Continue reading…]

Comments are closed.