Quinta Jurecic writes:

Michael Feinberg had not been planning to leave the FBI. But on May 31, he received a phone call from his boss asking him about a personal friendship with a former FBI agent who was known for criticizing President Donald Trump. Feinberg, an assistant special agent in charge at the FBI’s field office in Norfolk, Virginia, realized right away that he was in the crosshairs of the bureau’s leadership at an unusually chaotic time. If his 15-year career at the bureau was coming to an end, he wanted to depart with at least some dignity rather than being marched out the door. By the following afternoon, he had resigned.

The FBI has long seen itself as an organization built on expertise. Its founder, J. Edgar Hoover, was an early and devoted advocate of professionalizing the government bureaucracy, to the point of mandating that agents wear a dark suit and striped tie. Now, however, the bureau is in the early stages of something like a radical deprofessionalization. The most important quality for an FBI official to have now appears to be not competence but loyalty. The exiling of Feinberg and others like him is an effort to engineer and accelerate this transformation.

Feinberg’s boss, Special Agent in Charge Dominique Evans, didn’t allege any misconduct on his part, Feinberg told me. Rather, as Feinberg set out in his resignation letter the following day, Evans explained that FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino had found out that Feinberg had maintained a friendship with the former counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok, a longtime target of Trump’s ire. During Trump’s first term, Strzok was fired from the FBI—and became a recurring target of Fox News segments—after the Justice Department released text messages in which he’d disparaged the president. Trump has repeatedly attacked him over his work on the bureau’s 2016 investigation into Russian election interference (a topic of renewed interest for the president these days).

The association between Feinberg and Strzok was enough for the bureau to cancel a potential promotion for Feinberg, he told me. Evans, Feinberg said, suggested that he might face demotion, and that he would soon have to take a polygraph test about his friendship with Strzok. He quit instead. (The FBI declined to comment on what it characterized as a personnel matter; when I reached out to Norfolk in hopes of speaking with Evans, the field office declined to comment as well.)

In his resignation letter, Feinberg lamented the “decay” of the FBI. “I recount those events more in sorrow than in anger,” he wrote. “I love my country and our Constitution with a fervor that mere language will not allow me to articulate, and it pains me that my profession will no longer entail being their servant.” Since leaving the federal workforce, he has decided to speak out—because, he told me, agents still at the bureau who fear retribution asked him to. Feinberg is now planning to spend time writing about these issues while he—like many other government employees forced out by this administration—figures out what to do next. In a recently published essay, he argued that the FBI has become obsessed with “ideological purity and the ceaseless politicization of the workforce,” which “makes us all less safe.” [Continue reading…]