Browsed by
Category: Law/Crime

The case that could be Fox’s next Dominion

The case that could be Fox’s next Dominion

The New York Times reports: Of all the distortions and paranoia that Tucker Carlson promoted on his since-canceled Fox News program, one looms large: a conspiracy theory that an Arizona man working as a covert government agent incited the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol to sabotage and discredit former President Donald J. Trump and his political movement. What’s known about the man — a two-time Trump voter named Ray Epps — is that he took part in demonstrations…

Read More Read More

Where Clarence Thomas entered an elite circle and opened a door to the Supreme Court

Where Clarence Thomas entered an elite circle and opened a door to the Supreme Court

The New York Times reports: On Oct. 15, 1991, Clarence Thomas secured his seat on the Supreme Court, a narrow victory after a bruising confirmation fight that left him isolated and disillusioned. Within months, the new justice enjoyed a far-warmer acceptance to a second exclusive club: the Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans, named for the Gilded Age author whose rags-to-riches novels represented an aspirational version of Justice Thomas’s own bootstraps origin story. If Justice Thomas’s life had unfolded as…

Read More Read More

GOP states quit the program that fights voter fraud. Now they’re scrambling

GOP states quit the program that fights voter fraud. Now they’re scrambling

Politico reports: Over the past year and a half, eight Republican-led states quit a nonpartisan program designed to keep voter rolls accurate and up to date. Top Republican election officials in those states publicly argued the program was mismanaged. The conspiracy theorists who cheered them on falsely insisted it was a front for liberals to take control of elections. But experts say the program, known as the Electronic Registration Information Center, was among the best nationwide tool states had to…

Read More Read More

Prosecutors in Trump classified documents case are facing threats

Prosecutors in Trump classified documents case are facing threats

The Washington Post reports: Individual prosecutors involved in the classified documents case against former president Donald Trump are facing substantial harassment and threats online and elsewhere, according to extremism experts and a government official familiar with the matter. At the same time, two officials said, federal agencies have not observed a general increase in threats against law enforcement in the weeks since Trump was indicted in South Florida — a sharp contrast from the surge of violent rhetoric in the…

Read More Read More

Restricting the govt. from speaking to tech companies will spread disinformation and harm democracy

Restricting the govt. from speaking to tech companies will spread disinformation and harm democracy

Leah Litman and Laurence H. Tribe write: On July 4, federal Judge Terry A. Doughty in the Western District of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. Biden, a case that basically turns some elected Republicans’ fixation on social media censorship into legal reality. The impetus behind the case is the now thoroughly debunked conspiracy theory that the government is somehow strong-arming Big Tech into censoring conservative speech and speakers in violation of the First Amendment. While there are, in theory, interesting questions about when…

Read More Read More

Federal judge halts new Florida law he calls ‘latest assault’ on voting

Federal judge halts new Florida law he calls ‘latest assault’ on voting

Politico reports: A federal judge on Monday blocked a new Florida election law pushed by Republicans that puts restrictions on voter registration groups, calling it “Florida’s latest assault on the right to vote.” U.S. Chief District Judge Mark Walker granted a preliminary injunction against the law just days after it went into effect. Walker is an appointee of former President Barack Obama who has repeatedly ruled against the state in past legal challenges to election measures put in place by…

Read More Read More

Can John Roberts disarm Democratic threats to overhaul the Supreme Court?

Can John Roberts disarm Democratic threats to overhaul the Supreme Court?

Jonathan Chait writes: The Republican Party has been in desperate need of a pragmatic leader who can gauge public opinion, shrewdly husband political capital, and advance the party’s agenda in sustainable ways. That leader has materialized in the form of John Roberts. The chief justice of the United States is attempting to navigate the disjuncture between voters, who on the whole are sharply divided but have slightly favored Democrats, and the power Republicans have accumulated through the Supreme Court, which is quasi-permanent…

Read More Read More

How Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearing set the stage for the unraveling of affirmative action today

How Clarence Thomas’ confirmation hearing set the stage for the unraveling of affirmative action today

Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw writes: In October 1991, I was part of the legal team that supported Anita Hill in her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in which she bravely alleged sexual harassment at the hands of now-Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. His confirmation by that committee, chaired by then-Democratic Sen. Joe Biden, was one of the most consequential moments in setting the future trajectory of the ideals that matter most to me — civil rights, gender equity and our…

Read More Read More

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s bold debut and independent streak

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s bold debut and independent streak

The Washington Post reports: In a rare public speech this spring, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson talked to law school graduates about the challenges of starting a new job and about her love of musical theater. One of her favorites, she said, is the smash hit “Hamilton.” A particular song resonates: “History Has Its Eyes on You.” “Given my own experience over the past year, I think it’s pretty obvious why,” she told the crowd at Boston University School of…

Read More Read More

Half the police force quit. Crime dropped

Half the police force quit. Crime dropped

Radley Balko writes: In a staggering report last month, the Department of Justice documented pervasive abuse, illegal use of force, racial bias and systemic dysfunction in the Minneapolis Police Department. City police officers engaged in brutality or made racist comments, even as a department investigator rode along in a patrol car. Complaints about police abuse were often slow-walked or dismissed without investigation. And after George Floyd’s death, instead of ending the policy of racial profiling, the police just buried the…

Read More Read More

Trump pressured Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey to overturn 2020 election

Trump pressured Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey to overturn 2020 election

The Washington Post reports: In a phone call in late 2020, President Donald Trump tried to pressure Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) to overturn the state’s presidential election results, saying that if enough fraudulent votes could be found it would overcome Trump’s narrow loss in Arizona, according to three people familiar with the call. Trump also repeatedly asked Vice President Mike Pence to call Ducey and prod him to find the evidence to substantiate Trump’s claims of fraud, according to…

Read More Read More

Homophobic businesses in the U.S. have a powerful ally: the Supreme Court

Homophobic businesses in the U.S. have a powerful ally: the Supreme Court

Moira Donegan writes: On Friday the US supreme court expanded the right to free speech into a right of businesses to discriminate. In a 6-3 decision, with the majority opinion by Neil Gorsuch, the justices declared that a Colorado civil rights statute prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in public businesses violates the first amendment’s freedom of speech. The ruling appears to formalize the right of homophobic business owners to not serve gay people in some situations. 303…

Read More Read More

The Supreme Court will decide if abusive spouses have a right to own guns

The Supreme Court will decide if abusive spouses have a right to own guns

Ian Millhiser writes: Last February, the far-right United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a federal law prohibiting individuals from “possessing a firearm while under a domestic violence restraining order” is unconstitutional. On Friday, the Supreme Court announced that it will hear this case. It is fairly likely that the justices will reverse the Fifth Circuit’s extraordinary decision — as many as six current members of the Court have signaled that, while some of them support an expansive…

Read More Read More

Ending affirmative action may be just the beginning

Ending affirmative action may be just the beginning

Aziz Huq writes: It is easy to think of the Supreme Court’s decision invalidating Harvard and UNC-Chapel Hill’s affirmative action programs as the end of a long road. A court with a Republican-appointed majority has been chipping away at the legality of using race to allocate state benefits since the Reagan administration. And a young lawyer in Reagan’s White House by the name of John Roberts candidly condemned state affirmative action measures in blunt terms as “highly objectionable.” Now, after…

Read More Read More

‘A tragedy for us all’: Supreme Court Justice Jackson blasts majority’s affirmative action ruling

‘A tragedy for us all’: Supreme Court Justice Jackson blasts majority’s affirmative action ruling

CNBC reports: Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson excoriated her colleagues who voted to strike down race-conscious college admissions policies, accusing the majority of “turning back the clock” on affirmative action. “With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat,” Jackson wrote in a thundering dissent to the major court ruling Thursday. “But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life,” she wrote. “History speaks. In some form,…

Read More Read More

There’s a time bomb in progressives’ big Supreme Court voting case win

There’s a time bomb in progressives’ big Supreme Court voting case win

Richard L. Hasen writes: It is indeed a cause for celebration that the United States Supreme Court, on a 6-3 vote in Moore v. Harper, rejected an extreme version of the “independent state legislature” theory that could have upended the conduct of elections around the country and paved the way for state legislatures to engage in election subversion. But after the celebration comes the inevitable hangover, and with all the hoopla it is easy to miss that the Supreme Court…

Read More Read More