Michelle Goldberg writes:

Will Lawrence, one of the founders of the Sunrise Movement, a progressive environmentalist group, was supposed to be unelectable in the purple House district in Michigan held by a Republican, Tom Barrett. When he pulled ahead in his primary, a headline on the influential political site Punchbowl said, “Democrats’ Nightmare in Michigan.” Representative Hillary Scholten, a centrist Michigan Democrat, told Axios, “He can’t win.” During the general election, Republicans gloated when Lawrence’s old social media posts emerged, including one calling nuclear family homes an “isolating, individualistic, violent way of organizing society” and another dreaming of a world of “free and open migration.” I worried that the left might have cost Democrats a swing seat.

But when I met Lawrence last summer in the Seventh District — a largely white middle-class place with lots of rural and exurban areas — he insisted that outsiders were misreading the environment. “People are tired of these corporate-funded Republicans and corporate-funded Democrats,” he said. He would win people over, he argued, with opposition to the war in Iran and, crucially, to the spread of data centers. “Stopping these A.I. data centers has been a huge uniting issue across people of all political persuasions,” he said.

Republican PACs, flush with tech money, spent more against Lawrence than any other Democratic House candidate. Mailers called him “the most radical Democratic candidate in America” and warned of the socialist menace. (He’d been a member of the Democratic Socialists of America until July.) It didn’t matter: Lawrence won by just over 3 points.

Tuesday night’s blue tsunami carried so many Democrats to victory that we can’t attribute every win to candidate skill or strategy, especially a relatively narrow one like Lawrence’s. (In Iowa, a Democrat who’d suspended his statehouse campaign because of health problems was elected anyway.) But many of the triumphant Democratic underdogs were united by their opposition to Silicon Valley’s priorities. They promised to stand up to the domineering tech titans who’ve clustered around Donald Trump, arrogating to themselves the right to define America’s future. The election was an epic repudiation of the president, but it was also a democratic rebuke of Silicon Valley by voters who felt their ability to write their own destinies slipping away.

After Trump, there was no bigger loser on Tuesday than Elon Musk, who spent over $400 million backing Republicans. He poured more than half of that sum into Texas, his home since 2020, when he left California out of anger at regulation and Covid restrictions. He later moved most of his business empire to Texas and even built his own town, Starbase, there. Musk almost single-handedly funded the Senate campaign of Texas’ widely despised attorney general, Ken Paxton. He tweeted obsessively about James Talarico, Paxton’s opponent, amplifying conspiracy theories that Talarico was in a mental hospital when he was really sick with the flu.

Talarico, in turn, sometimes seemed to be running as much against Musk as against Paxton. Even before he won the Democratic nomination, he railed against Musk’s greed, saying: “The reason poverty exists in the wealthiest country on earth is not because we can’t feed the poor. It’s because we can’t satisfy the rich. But what we can do is tax trillionaires out of existence.” Last month he told a packed rally in Austin — until recently a tech bro Valhalla — that Musk was trying to buy himself the state. “Elon Musk wants our land,” said Talarico. “He wants our water. He wants our tax dollars. He wants his very own personal United States senator.” [Continue reading…]